Chapter Calculation Wizardry. Or keep it around for a rainy day.
 
 

Filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free.About this item

 

Step 1: Consolidat in g Your Names Step 4: Write Your Email s Step 5: Choose Your Recipients Step 6: Send Your Email Blast Step 7: Process Opt-Outs Step 8: Process Bounced Email s Step 9: Follow Up Step 10 : Ref in e and Repeat Appedix 1: Export in g and Import in g Contact Information This article provides an easy- to -follow, step-by-step guide to help in dividuals and small.

This guide will help you get started with your own program quickly and. FileMaker Pro email market in g solution windows 10 home join ad free send an email to its cus to mer base.

With in 24 hours, they had sold out the in ven to ry. Time spent writ in g the email and send in g it out? Less than 3. Email market in g helps bus in esses see in stant sales from exist in g cus to mers, as. Despite the bus in ess benefits of email market in g, many bus in esses are either still. The right way is send in g compell in g emails to cus to mers and prospects that want. The right filemakr ols are at your f in gertips and узнать больше здесь enough for anyone to use — as long.

This step is all about gather in g names and gett in g them in to an easily accessible. Can you really have all your names in one place? Yes, you. You need one that you can cus to mize to meet your unique. There are a few ways that you can consolidate your names in to one place, but to. FileMaker Pro can read, such as Microsoft Excel. Once you export your names, you can simply import them in to the FileMaker Pro. Build in g your own list of current cus to mers, past cus to mers, and prospects versus.

If you completed Step 1, you now have your exist in g names in a database. But up. Filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free you want to do now is fill in those empty fields, arvanced addition to add in g new. You want to. All you need to get started. For additional in formation and privacy. Comb in in g a variety of content advancwd different in tervals is acceptable to most. You want a blend of edi to rial and.

In order to decide on the mix, figure out what you th in k will help build your. Ask yourself these questions for. Do they want in formative news-like, edi to rial content? Would they appreciate blgo casual greet in g filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free in g a special day, prk a. Would a comb in ation of any of these types of communication be appropriate? Once you have your email campaign mix figured out, writ in g your first email. Write short paragraphs and l in k to your website for longer articles or have.

If your advancdd to ries are to o long, no one will read them. Treat your current cus to mers differently than prospects. Make sure they feel. The Subject l in e is filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free. With junk mail filters on almost every bogk box. Be sure. Make sure your copy gets right to filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free po in t.

To make your emails more. You are receiv in g this newsletter because you, or someone us in g this. We have a lot fun and excit in g events com in g up soon so be sure to.

Feel free to forward this email to. To unsubscribe from this. S to p by or call to schedule your free. I wanted to take a few m in utes to wish prp a very Happy Birthday!

Just br in g this email in to the shop, or if. I hope this day br in gs you great happ in ess and joy, and I hope to. See below for some h in ts to help you. Filemkaer establishes a framework of adm in istrative, civil, and crim in al to ols. While your email to your cus to mers, is not technically spam because your.

FileMaker Pro will put all the emails in your Drafts folder. You will want to go to. Tim in g of the email is important. Most only have a life of 3 days so send in g early in. But good days for send in g email change as often as the hot new color. Drafts folder so all you need to do is click Send Filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free on the right day, at the right.

Once your email has been sent, you should be receiv in g lots of phone calls, order. Filemamer will also, most likely, have some cus to mers. You must be vigilant in process in g Opt-Out requests in order to keep your. Remember, just because cus to mers.

Assum in g you followed the steps above in provid filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free g recipients in structions for. Opt in g-out of receiv in g your email, you will have Opt-out requests that need to be. Opt-out requests may come in via email, paper mail, or by phone. So be sure you retrieve all Opt-out requests from all channels before. To process Opt-out requests in FileMaker Pro, you simply need to update the.

Group and Contacts with in the email Filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free tab. To do this, follow these steps:. These messages. First, you will want to update the contact records for all bounced emails.

Here is. To def in e the field, you need to fill in 3 pieces источник статьи. Then you can decide how you want to get more current valid email addresses.

You filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free resend all the bounced emails aga in in one month or more. This will. You can choose to call cus to mers and let them know that you tried to send. You can send a postcard or letter to everyone in the postal mail to ask for.

Make sure that you mail merge in the email address. To pr in t mail tree g labels for postcards or envelopes, follow these steps:.

Click Pr in t. Then click the Cont in ue but to n to. You should now have picture perfect labels ready to affix to postcards or. You will be notified if filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free. Enter by send in g me an email with your contact in formation to :. There are many ways to follow up with your recipients, in clud in g send in g another. Send in g Follow Up Email : Just like pr in t advertis in g and television. We talked about how to send emails us in g the. And because. If they want to give you a new address booklet microsoft word 2016 free download the phone, take.

 

Filemaker pro 17 advanced bogo free.FileMaker Go 17 for iOS

 

Before the ConCons, when Go was in its infancy, and probably to spur adoption, you could connect Go without any license. The difficult part would be installing an older version of FMG. You can mix both. It is not clear to me how it works. I think you get two license keys and one fmcert. Exactly, it is not clear. It may be that one gets a site license which gives them a good amount of anonymous user capability as well. I asked about an existing non-profit client of mine whom she looked up and said they have a site license – she said their license does enable an unlimited mix of Users and Concurrent users – that is if she understood and explained that license model correctly.

I strongly doubt the unlimited nature of this. I’ve been involved in the sale of many site license and they all specify a maximum number of users covered. Usually something easily countable like the of people on the payroll of a legal entity. If they pull up the actual license it should clearly state the actual number of licensed users.

I have seen some licenses where there were an X number of Pro users licensed but an unlimited number of Go users. Those were grandfathered anomalies, I don’t think you can a license like that anymore.

So when talking to sales, make the questions explicit and don’t make assumptions. And always check what the final paperwork says. Surely Apple no longer owns FM. If they do, they should be ashamed of this mess of mis-information, amateurism, confusion and disgruntlement.

Any time there is a license change, it causes confusion. The core principle behind the licensing is simple. FMI understands it fine. Feel free to ask about your situation. Between all of us and FMI, we should be able to get it sorted with you. We are all on the same team here. I think what happened is that they came out with a great idea and then didn’t work through all the possible scenarios that would be affected by that idea.

Julie did a great job of going through a several scenarios in her licensing webinars, but I just think that they didn’t think of every possible, conceivable configuration that could be imagined. They will get it sorted out.

We just have to allow them to be people just trying to do the best they can. Omniscience is elusive. Well, for me anyway. I have clients come to me all the time and say, “well, what about this particular way I need it? Sorry, I didn’t think of that,” more often than I am comfortable with. Once the CEO for my client is back from vacation I will discuss this whole thing with her and see if we need a deep discussion with FileMaker Sales, or what she wants to do. So far analysis is not complete it looks like the best route forward from a money standpoint is FileMaker Hosting Pros dedicated FileMaker 17 hosting and bring your own site license.

But as you pointed out, the devil is in the details. I have asked FileMaker Sales for a copy of the site license agreement. Reply to this message by replying to this email, or go to the message on FileMaker Community. Start a new discussion in Discussions by email or at FileMaker Community.

Following Re: Deployment in 17 in these streams: Inbox. Mike O’Neil marked cftutt’s reply on Deployment in 17 as helpful. View the full reply. With out the Runtime option I would not have purchased 25 years of updates. It’s the main reason I keep upgrading. I don’t sell my software. It’s not for profit.

Yet I buy upgrades that mount into thousands of dollars over the years. Same here. But that’s not the point. I would totally understand, if FMI doesn’t care about you as a single license buyer.

How many of us developers are actually out there? But what I simply don’t get is the fact, why FMI doesn’t try to multiply these figures and try and make some good money from our customers?

As I wrote before I don’t care, if FMI charges me money for every Runtime that I sell as long as it is reasonable and doesn’t milk me or my clients to death. I sold thousands of Runtimes since I started. Multiply that with maybe 10, 20, or even 50 Bucks for FMI.

And now multiply that with all the Runtime developers out there. We are talking about millions of Dollars here! But it doesn’t stop here. In my vision FMPA should be a platform to fulfill more than one need. It should be the number one database platform for. The technology for nearly all of that is already there and just has to be refined an reasonably licensed.

All of them could bring FMI money. If FMI for example would work harder on the iOS SDK in order to let developers bring their software more easily to the App Store that could generate tens of millions of users, all paying their share to Filemaker. These are no small fishes any more. This is huge! We are talking about tens or even hundreds of millions of Dollars! Same with Standalone Runtime solutions. And every user of a Runtime is a potential user of FMP in the future.

That could generate even more revenue in the future. In order to become the number one database solution for all the above mentioned scenarios FMI would have to make the entry level much cheaper, like 99,- EUR, so that the average Joe who’s looking for a simple database solution for himself Bento, anyone? Once he’s on the platform he might even become a professional developer, just like me.

The proposal to provide students with a free copy of FMP has also already been given by Christian Schmitz. That’s another move into the right direction. There is so much potential out there and FMI is trying to kill it with their greedy focus on the big customers. There’s nothing wrong about looking for these kinds of clients. But honestly, FMI, if you don’t see the potential of millions and millions of private users you should maybe ask your mother for her latest history I’d only like to mention the Apple App Store, iTunes and Apple Music here.

FileMaker Pro is so much more than a database tool for professionals. It is a sweet entry drug for programmers of all kinds and a useful tool for everybody! So please stop your high price policy and focus on the mass market!

Bring your marketing to the Century and make FileMaker Pro great again! How can FileMaker then police the fact that parts of the runtime might need to be licensed under the terms of the libraries they are using. It’s not just that you can pay them when you sell a runtime, by it’s very nature it can be copied many times, how do you collect revenue from those copies????

All the people I see here want the Runtime to never dies because it gives them something they can sell for which the only cost to them is Pro licences to create them. As a business model for FMI, I think your millions statement above is somewhat overblown The kinds of people who seem to shout loudest about runtimes here would be finding every way possible to not pass that revenue to FIleMaker IMHO. Sorry jrenfrew , but that’s not fair. How can you claim that? If you read my statement carefully you should have noticed that I’m willing to share my revenue with FMI in order to appreciate their work.

And if they are willing to make the deal they will certainly find a way to charge my customers. And no, I don’t think that my numbers are exaggerated. Think about it. And yes there are those who express a desire for thin client to fulfil this, but telling FMI they need to follow action A because it suits my personal needs or vision of the ‘solution’ is hardly likely to be a success in the long-term.

In a similar light Now Peer 2 Peer is not a sell-able feature, the reality of it is, I won’t be selling a single licence anymore. Whereas runtime was deprecated, quite some time ago It was sneakily and silently ‘re-branded’ for testing purposes only.

There is no mention of that anywhere, other than within the product itself and the wording that was chosen purposefully restricts its use, without caring what the use case was. The testing purposes only did not and does not need to exist, when the ‘this connection is not encrypted” or other wording they used, says everything it needed to.

As for runtimes, the writing has been on the wall for a long time. Its clear to me that because of the backlash, they are now purposefully restricting access to some new functionality in an attempt to make it an undesirable product and therefore, when finally removed, people will care a lot less, because its missing so much.

Unlike before, it was only really missing ‘third party licences products’ PDF, Charts FileMaker is not as flexible as it once was. Anyway, i’m going to stop singing the same tune, it will have zero effect and I am just wasting my own time.

If this is really the case, please tell your SBA person directly. It is true many of the gateways are closing. Bento and peer to peer are two of them. I initially started with Bento and thought it was underpriced. I know I am throwing around P2P perpetual prices with FUL annual prices, but we are taking about cost of entry, right? Everyone needs to look at the facts. Especially about P2P. It is and I have. My sales rep even told the US I’m in the UK that we was an important customer and tried to help the case along, but the end result was..

For me, its not really about price, although that is of course a consideration. Its about the logistics and technicalities. Our clients do not know FileMaker, they do not have IT departments, they use FileMaker for our solution and that is all. Well it is easy enough to convert them to SaaS with Web Direct most of the time.

There is still the issue of the URL not being branded for the client. In every case the important thing about Runtime has always been the branding and never the price. Surprised; I would have thought that P2P is only a price consideration, never an ‘ease of deployment’ choice. If you were able to guide your clients to do P2P well, with proper backups and minimal risk to the files then kudos to you. But IMHO you are the exception and not the rule.

It usually causes grief for the business corrupted files, lost data, few or no backups and I’m sure support calls for FMI and probably reputational damage to both the developer and FMI because of all that. For most people. Our p2p based system has been in use and proven for many years, very successful, simple to install, update, upgrade all with a click automated backup routines etc.

Most things are completely automated, it works really well. Maybe we are the exception, I have certainly been told we are one of few who used the SBA program in the way it was designed. This can be difficult at times when the issue is caused by FileMaker Pro itself, since FMI don’t talk much about future releases, even if its a critical issue.. Since our solution is in constant development, always being improved, with lots of free updates included, all available at the click of a button and fully automated throughout such a process..

Which in turn, changes our products, how we deliver it, how we support our clients, how we charge, how much we charge and more The unannounced and sudden change left a bad taste in my mouth too. What’s next on the chopping block. That’s not mentioning the things that go unfixed for quite some time.

Yes, some things are put on a deprecated list Overall, my decision has already been made some time ago. Since you state that you ‘have made your mind up’, I’m assuming that you are thinking of leaving FM behind, which makes the above statement happen anyway. I think the choice of ‘run framework’ and its moving pieces, especilly if it has no license cost impact like you stated, makes that this:.

It sounds like you are taking care of all the complexities anyway so why would your target market change? Without cost being a factor you can hide the technical complexities with any platform choice and provide the same ease-of-deployment like you have now.

I totally feel your pain, having to change how a product runs and is deployed has a big impact on a business like yours different than folks who do nothing but custom software. So what I write is not criticism of you or your business model, but a conversation that may help other people who look at P2P as a viable business model.

Clearly some better documentation is in order. Neither the FM17 requirements page:. I seem to recall having seen the same notice that you mention but I can’t find it now. So maybe it isn’t so. But back to the core: there have been many many threads over many years comparing P2P to FMS-based deployments so I don’t think we need to rehash those.

I would choose FMS even for tiny deployments because of all its native features that are not possible in P2P. But they made peer-to-peer hosting unnecessary by giving the license to server along with the development tools. Ther is no benefit to P2P hosting that helps the platform. No SSL safties. No web publishing. No scheduled scripts. All things that can have a tremendously positive impact on your experience.

Honestly, I love FileMaker I have done for years. The decision was not made lightly I can assure you. The sad part is, the message need not be there. The functionality has not changed one bit and would still be suitable if it did not include those four words “for testing purposes only”. The initial part of the message about the connection not being encrypted is perfectly fine and I have explained that to FMI, but I can’t bundle a licence with the aim of using a feature that is now only for testing.

I don’t understand how FMI’s documentation is silent on the subject either. The dialog itself can be dismissed with a “don’t show again”, but will be displayed initially. Yet, click the padlock and it doesn’t say anything about testing only. Perhaps we need to have a more painless way to install server for those customer-setup situations.

It needs to be smoother and not more complex. It should “just work. Maybe just make a version of Pro that includes the “p2p” that is more robust than current.

Sell two versions of Pro: Single user and three-user, either one of which can access FMS if you graduate to it. But the three user version is not the disaster-waiting-to-happen that it is now. And FMS17 makes that even a whole lot easier with fewer initial decisions that need to be made.

So if a fully automated installation without client intervention is what you have in mind, the tools have been there for years Knowing that I will never get into the deep waters of handling large complicated Solutions with FMP as most of you have, I would value some input on weather or not the iOS SDK app is a solution for a small runtime guy like me?

Start a new thread with this question and link to it here, this one is getting long already and your question is specific enough to warrant its own thread. Understood, but they are still just “tools,” not the reality for the situations we are discussing here. That approach will never be as simple as just firing up an app. What I was talking about was a version of pro that included a more robust P2P functionality, not an easier way to install Server. I’m thinking a way to allow Pro self-hosting to be a viable option for 2- or 3-person deployments would enable FileMaker to serve the needs of far more vertical markets, and perhaps even generate more potential for license sales for FMI in market segments that it cannot currently serve well.

We already have something robust called FileMaker Server. I remember a project in Access sometimes ago. The Access file was shared among users – I know it’s not P2P but there were no Access server, at least in that time. And one day, the db crashed very hard.

That has been quite a nightmare. I’m not sure because that would remove one of the very big things that is important to me and why I came to the FM platform to begin with: flexibility and scalability. If there was a ‘robust P2P’ for users, what would be the upgrade path be?

Now you have raised the expectation that migrating from “robust P2P” to server would be as seamless as setting up ‘robust P2P’ to begin with. If I was the client I’d be surprised by the need for now needing another product, why? Why not have ‘robust P2P’ that is scalable to the full extent?

Whatever number you pick for max ‘robust P2P’ connections it is going to be very arbitrary and requiring a big jump when crossing that line. FMS is already scalable for 1 to a few hundred users depending on the nature of the solution , and it is already included in your license. And we already have the tools to make the installation easy. That’s the flexibility that I want in the platform. If hands-off installation is a big part of my business model, I can make that happen.

In the end it is going to come down to cost vs. For those who are in those markets I can only suggest to help make the case by putting numbers up that are realistic and based on actual business. Chapter 5: Creating a Database. Chapter 6: The Interface: Layout Mode. Chapter 8: The Processes: ScriptMaker. Chapter Building Advanced Interfaces. Chapter Data Modeling in FileMaker. Chapter Calculation Wizardry.

Chapter Scripting in Depth. Part IV: Integrity and Security. Chapter Maintaining Referential Integrity. Chapter Maintaining and Restoring Data. Part V: Raising the Bar. Chapter Efficient Code, Efficient Solutions. Chapter Extending FileMaker’s Capabilities. Part VI: Appendixes. Appendix A: Glossary. Appendix C: About the Web Site. Copyright Date. Target Audience. Dewey Decimal. Dewey Edition. Business seller information. Orchestrate your apps.

Automate your work. Escape from app chaos by bringing everyday apps together to create automated workflows to save time and money. Manage marketing leads, track IT tickets, facilitate orders, and more. Companies around the globe — of every size — are using Claris for their digital transformation. We have updated our privacy policy, effective October 13, You can register your BOGO license key as you would with any other key, and you may be able to get installation support via the phone line.

Contact FileMaker Sales if you have any more specific questions. Was considering trying to sell the extra copy on eBay as I saw multiple sellers marketing the FM 16 Advance product. Some of the ebay sales can be really shady and not legitimate if you read through the fine print. Also, if someone does try to activate a BOGO license you sold them and it gets investigated, you could be invalidated for breaking the rules.

Not worth the risk for a small payoff. Make friends with someone in your local usergroup and give them the license. Or keep it around for a rainy day.

Please let me know if you have any further questions. I’m not sure this is valid.. You are only supposed to use the BOGO deal one time and get only one free copy. I have called them before about this. Only one is allowed, but I believe there is nothing to stop you from making multiple orders. Your risk if the additional keys do not show up. It is clearly one purchase single licence per individual, corporate body or entity per promotional cycle. However that being said, I have always taken advantage of the BOGOF when it is available, usually twice per year from memory.

I have accumulated multiple offers over the lifetime of FMP 11, 12, 13 which were added the annual site maintenance agreement at renewal and they maintained their upgrade through to So, as I understand it, if my second license key is unused at Dec it will still be valid because it was purchased under that offer, but it can sit dormant until my “entity” fills the second seat?

When you purchase FMP under the buy one get one deal, FM will issue two license keys and these keys do not expire. It is only a digital download, so you will need to keep a backup of the install files. I download all versions for backup, MAC, Windows 32 and 64 bit, they are included in the purchase.

You can call FMI support to download the files again at a later date, but I’m sure there is a time limit. I maintain an extra backup in my dropbox. This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only.